NewsHans' BiographyTeam (Present & Past)DiscographyMediaArchivesJukeboxFan CoversAbout/Feedback
 SEARCH
 

 FAN COMMENTS
Rejected scores have gotten official releases before, such as Timeline by Jerry Goldsmith. So even if the Snyder Cut never gets released, I'd hope Junkie could potentially still work out a deal to get his original score out there. Keeping my fingers crossed.No Time to Die coming by Decca 27th March<br><br>https:// www.udiscovermusic.com/news/hans-zimmer-no- time-to-die-soundtrack/?fbclid=IwAR1UtjXatRpCQyXWJ9f7YYfT9Eb k5jy4d7XnlS6XzX4vTiOTxFfvQ0PWgaIIt all depends on whether WB releases the Snyder Cut OR no I don't even want to think about the other case & with the way things are going now it looks like we'll definitely get Zack Snyder's Justice League if not today then tomorrow and only then your question will have any meaning.<br>TL;DR the score will only happen after WB #ReleaseTheSnyderCutHybrid, Oscar Senen and Joan Martorell orchestrate the score ?Budapest, please :(
Same question here, is concert in Poland even concidered to occur?if the link doesn't work for some reason, the song is called Cliffhanger Sky High on youtubeHi All, sorry it took so long to upload, My friend helped me set up a youtube channel to upload tracks to. I am very inspired by the classic Zimmer Scores of the 90's. I envisioned A climactic rescue aboard A speeding train for this particular cue.<br>https://youtu.be/4WyMIcpqMRk <br>I avoided bringing up the TF films in this thread until AFTER you dragged them into it.<br>===============<br><br>No one dragged anything. <br><br>I briefly mentioned that franchise, among many other things you conveniently ignored (you do that a lot), to prove a simple point: that a director doesn't get to make 5 movies from the same franchise if people aren't enjoying his work. Simple as that. I never talked about the "quality" of each of those movies. Go see the comment again.<br><br>YOU picked up on this and started talking obsessively about the TF. <br><br><br>==============<br>Going after every person that doesn't like Bay and trying to obsessively "debunk" them is psychotic, yes. <br>==============<br><br>Look at your first comment here, pal. Look at it good! Snarky, dismissive, almost trollish, and with a clear intention to provoke people. Let me quote it: "Another day, another Bay film that doesn't know what fun is." <br><br>I only "go after" people who can't share their opinions in a respectful, mature way. There are a lot of comments here I disagreed with. But I never confronted those people. Why? Because they know how to properly share an opinion. <br><br>I only go after people who provoke, make fun of someone/something and troll. I've never "attacked" a person who didn't deserve that kind of response. My post history here speaks for itself. <br><br><br>===================<br>And constantly referring to other people's opinions and whinging about the box office doesn't make you objective, especially with how self-contradictory the latter has been.<br>===================<br><br>Nope. Not even close. <br><br>You're just bitter that I'm using quotes from proven, talented people like Spielberg who support Bay. What quotes can your side use? Just quotes from knucklehead film bloggers and critics who hate half of what Hollywood makes. <br><br>No one with an actual integrity and knowledge of the film business can dismiss what Bay has accomplished. You may not like his stuff, but to completely dismiss him as a filmmaker is.......moronic. Truth is, it's only small fries on the internet who are angry that their favorite mid-level directors aren't as big and successful as Bay.<br><br>That's really the bottom line. <br><br>Speaking of that, who is YOUR favorite filmmaker? Go ahead, share it with us. Let's see who is that PERFECT filmmaker you drool over.<br><br>I'm really curious.<br><br>==============<br>By your own "objective" reasoning, this would make them his worst films. But you don't acknowledge that, because you don't actually care about objectivity.<br>==============<br><br>Huh??<br><br>When did I said that box office success or box office failure means that a movie is good or bad?? I never that. So if you don't mind, stop putting words in my mouth.<br><br>Thank you. <br><br><br>==================<br>You care about faking it when it suits you, and chucking it when it doesn't<br>==================<br><br><br>Kinda ironic coming from the person who ignored the majority of the stuff I said here. Careful cherry-picking, convenient ignoring of stuff, and putting words in my mouth is apparently what you like to do. <br><br><br>================<br>What do you mean "next time?" Your first reply here was calling my opinion a joke.<br>================<br><br>Uhhhh, that's because it IS a joke. Because it is not true and because it was posted with the clear intention to provoke. You are the Negative Nancy here, my friend. Not me. Jesus Christ, even your nickname tells people exactly what they can expect from you......"Cynical Makooti". <br><br><br>====================<br>I didn't insult you for anything other than lying to win an argument<br>====================<br><br>Oh, that's true....................you're certainly not winning this argument. I mean, that's obvious. <br><br>And..... I never posted a lie. Just because "your sources" claim something different doesn't mean it's the truth. Pacific Rim wasn't a success - considering the huge expactations and the fact that the movie's budget is $200 freakin' million - and they DID try to start a franchise with 300. They failed. <br><br><br>================<br>Your lack of self-awareness is astounding.<br>================<br><br>That's rich. Coming from the guy who calls himself "Cynical Makooti". The guy who now plays the victim, even though he was the one who started this with a childish, trollish comment. <br><br>Look at my first reply to you. I was jokingly mimicking your style. Intentionally. Then you tried to be a smartass with your next reply. But EVEN THEN, I responded in a normal way with my second post. After that........you unleashed your true self. <br><br>And now, you're acting like the victim: "Poor me, being attacked by a crazy Bay fan!" <br><br>So please, don't talk about self-awareness. It ain't working.<br><br><br><br>================<br>Pacific Rim was a domestic bomb that turned things around with its international box office.<br>================<br><br>Haha, maybe you should read more Forbes. Take a look at what they said about the entire (already failed) Pac Rim universe. Read a bit more on how much money the studio lost from the first flick and why they actually went with a sequel. It ain't because the first one was a beloved hit. <br><br><br>=======<br>The Last Knight lost about $100M according to Paramount themselves. That doesn't sound like an international success to me.<br>=======<br><br>Okay, I believe you. Now, would you please share the link to that statement from Paramount. <br><br>Thank you. <br><br><br>=============<br>Maybe it does to you, but I can't speak for that little fantasy world you seem to be living in right now.<br>=============<br><br>Hey, it's certainly a better and more reasonable place than your world. A world where you completely dismiss and ignore the accomplishments of one of the biggest filmmakers out there.<br><br>What's your next claim? <br><br>That Donnie Trump is the best President in history?<br><br><br>Have a nice day!Do any of you think that Junkie's Justice League score will ever get released or leaked? I was really excited to hear how Junkie planned on developing the themes used in the prior DCEU movies. Especially the Batman themes from BVS. It's a damn shame how WB handled that film.
"Why do Bay naysayers pretend that Bay only directs TF movies? It's very interesting...... Pretty much all complaints against Bay are connected to the TF movies.<br><br>Newsflash: Bay was a proven and very successful action filmmaker wayyyyyyyyyyyyy before TF1."<br><br>Newsflash: I avoided bringing up the TF films in this thread until AFTER you dragged them into it.  Only then did I treat them as fair game.  Considering they make up a third of his filmography, I don't see why I SHOULDN'T address them.  How convenient is it that bringing them up is only ever valid when YOU do it?<br><br>More to the point, I already said I thought his decline kicked in from Pearl Harbor onwards.  The TF films are just his rock bottom.<br><br>"So let me get this straight: trying to be as objective as possible, in a non-threating way, quoting people who actually know what they're talking about and certainly not treating my opinion as fact, makes me......psychotic."<br><br>Going after every person that doesn't like Bay and trying to obsessively "debunk" them is psychotic, yes.  And constantly referring to other people's opinions and whinging about the box office doesn't make you objective, especially with how self-contradictory the latter has been.<br><br>Pain & Gain and 13 Hours, his supposedly best films, also have his lowest box office turnouts.  13 Hours was a flat-out bomb.  By your own "objective" reasoning, this would make them his worst films.  But you don't acknowledge that, because you don't actually care about objectivity.<br><br>You care about faking it when it suits you, and chucking it when it doesn't.<br><br>"Next time, I'll just act like a complete jerk, insulting everyone and everything."<br><br>What do you mean "next time?"  Your first reply here was calling my opinion a joke.  You already have this method down.  You're just too dishonest to admit it.<br><br>Notice how I avoided accusing you of anything until AFTER you started outright lying about movies and flaunting it as objective fact.<br><br>You insulted ME first, pal.  I didn't insult you for anything other than lying to win an argument.  Not for your opinions, not for your celebrity crush, for being a disingenuous twat. <br><br>Your lack of self-awareness is astounding.<br><br>"Reviews, RT scores, and crappy film blog "think pieces" are also not proof of quality."<br><br>Then it's a good thing I never quoted a single one of those, let alone as objective proof, isn't it?<br><br>Man, appeal to authority, appeal to popularity, mistaking correlation for causation, slothful induction, strawmanning, I could make a bingo game outta this.<br><br>"So that flick, according to you, turned a profit.......but TLK - budget of also $200 million and with a worldwide gross of $605 million..........is a bomb?"<br><br>Not "according to me."  According to the studios that make the actual films.  And Forbes.  Remember Forbes?  You considered their word inarguable fact a couple posts ago.<br><br>https://www.forbes.com/sites/scottmendelson/2013/09/02/pacif ic-rim-and-more-domestic-flops-that-became-global-hits/#3f3e 914d7c18<br><br>Well whaddaya know?<br><br>Pacific Rim was a domestic bomb that turned things around with its international box office.<br><br>That thing you said TF5 was but actually wasn't.<br><br>The Last Knight lost about $100M according to Paramount themselves.  That doesn't sound like an international success to me.<br><br>Maybe it does to you, but I can't speak for that little fantasy world you seem to be living in right now.<br><br>Wow!  Just wow!ThxSeville, The Bait, Ambrose Welcomes Nyah, Chimera Myth, Beach Fight, Ambrose Dies.Can we stop? I agree with the other guy more in his points, but it's clear that this is gonna keep going nowhere if you're gonna be so overly defensive about something that you claim is merely subjective.But here we are, calling dog-humping, Decepticon testicles, and mommy-on-pot-brownies "challenging the viewer."<br>======================<br><br><br>Why do Bay naysayers pretend that Bay only directs TF movies? It's very interesting...... Pretty much all complaints against Bay are connected to the TF movies.<br><br>Newsflash: Bay was a proven and very successful action filmmaker wayyyyyyyyyyyyy before TF1. <br><br>So no, "challenging the viewer" is not about Transformers. You chose to focus on these movies. Not me. I was actually reffering to Bay movies like The Island and especially Pain and Gain. <br><br>But I guess you like to talk only about Transformers.....Good for you. But that's not how a discussion works. <br><br><br>===================<br>Instead of accepting that your love of Bay is nothing more than a opinion, just as my claim that he misses the point of what makes action movies fun is, you turn into an overly-defensive nut, desperately quoting every opinion piece under the sun to pretend your opinion is some statistically-backed fact. I've seen you do this every time someone talks shit about Bay around here. It's psychotic.<br>===================<br><br><br>So let me get this straight: trying to be as objective as possible, in a non-threating way, quoting people who actually know what they're talking about and certainly not treating my opinion as fact, makes me......psychotic? <br><br>Wow! Just wow!<br><br>Next time, I'll just act like a complete jerk, insulting everyone and everything. For you, that is apparently the normal behavior.<br><br><br>======<br>Bad movies make money. Everyone knows that, and everyone knows that's not proof of quality.<br>=======<br><br>Reviews, RT scores, and crappy film blog "think pieces" are also not proof of quality. Also, a "bad" movie to you is the greatest movie for the guy walking next to you on the street. As Kevin Smith said: "Every movie is someone's favorite movie". <br><br>Let's try to keep that in mind.<br><br><br>============<br>That's not just a domestic bomb, that's a bomb altogether.<br>============<br><br>Really?<br><br>Then what do you have to say about Pacific Rim 1. I present to you.......the pure numbers:<br><br>Budget: $200 million. And that doesn't include the marketing cost.<br>Worldwide gross: $411,002,906<br><br>So that flick, according to you, turned a profit.......but TLK - budget of also $200 million and with a worldwide gross of $605 million..........is a bomb?<br><br>Wow! Just.....wow!
Yeah lol back then only Harold was confirmed.Can you tell me a names of cues, that was been on Klaus website?Formality indeed. Complicated ! lol<br><br>You can bet Blake Neely didn't need anyone to "write" those 10 seconds !! lolI always found these credits to be a bit confusing. Klaus Badelt is credited on almost every cue, even when his themes don't appear and another additional composer is credited as well. I thought maybe it was just a formality that Zimmer and Badelt were credited everywhere (I mean, how much could they be involved on a cue like "Welcome to the Caribbean"?), but then "No real ship" and "Sword Fight Pt. 2" have no Badelt for some reason. Does someone know a bit more about this?well the composer confirmed he is working on it to be released very soon<br>
Latest

Please install Flash®
and turn on Javascript.


Rate those CD:
Top 50





Rupert Gregson-WilliamsThomas FarnonTony ClarkeTom Howe
ComposerAdditional MusicAdditional MusicAdditional Music
The Legend Of Tarzan
Label: WaterTower Music
Length: 71'29
HZimmer.com rating:        Not yet rated
Fans rating:     rate at 1 out of 5 rate at 2 out of 5 rate at 3 out of 5 rate at 4 out of 5 rate at 5 out of 5   2/5 (6266 votes)
  1. Opar - Zoe Mthiyane (3:28)
    Rupert Gregson-Williams, Lebo M.
  2. Diamonds (4:50)
    Rupert Gregson-Williams
  3. Togetherness (1:44)
    Rupert Gregson-Williams
  4. Steamer And Butterfly (2:40)
    Rupert Gregson-Williams
  5. Orphaned (2:46)
    Rupert Gregson-Williams, Tony Clarke
  6. Returning Home (4:01)
    Rupert Gregson-Williams
  7. Campfire (2:40)
    Rupert Gregson-Williams, Thomas Farnon
  8. Tarzan And Jane (3:39)
    Rupert Gregson-Williams
  9. Village Ambush (4:41)
    Rupert Gregson-Williams, Tom Howe
  10. Catching The Train (2:16)
    Rupert Gregson-Williams, Tom Howe
  11. Rom's Plan (2:11)
    Rupert Gregson-Williams, Tom Howe
  12. Akut Fight (2:16)
    Rupert Gregson-Williams, Tony Clarke
  13. Elephants In The Night (3:12)
    Rupert Gregson-Williams, Lebo M.
  14. Jane Escapes (2:44)
    Rupert Gregson-Williams
  15. Jungle Shooting (2:41)
    Rupert Gregson-Williams
  16. Kala's Death (5:15)
    Rupert Gregson-Williams, Thomas Farnon
  17. Where Was Your Honor? (2:29)
    Rupert Gregson-Williams, Thomas Farnon
  18. Boma Port (4:04)
    Rupert Gregson-Williams
  19. Stampede (4:33)
    Rupert Gregson-Williams, Thomas Farnon
  20. On The Boat (3:10)
    Rupert Gregson-Williams
  21. The Legend Of Tarzan (2:36)
    Rupert Gregson-Williams
  22. Better Love (Film Version) - Hozier (3:23)
Create Topic

Write your own comment here (in english please)
This zone is only to post comment, not to ask for CD downloading, copying or trading !
Each comment can be possibly edited or deleted to ensure it is suitable for public presentation.

  Your name :     

Please enter number: 1451 

Danna reply Replies: 0 || 2017-03-21 18:47:24
Anyone know where to find the sheet music for this?

Swordroll reply Replies: 1 || 2016-12-21 00:01:24
Does anyone know where to find the film version of Stampede? There are a few slight differences.


Anonymous2016-12-21 03:39:31
On the blu ray

Hybrid Soldier reply Replies: 3 || 2016-12-04 17:43:06
Little composer credits here...


Felix2016-12-07 10:55:53
@hybrid

Will you upload Rupert's site any time?


Hybrid Soldier2016-12-07 20:43:51
Yes, I've started working on it, takes time to catch up ! lol


Felix2016-12-07 21:35:49
Great Thanks! :)

Frenchans reply Replies: 0 || 2016-09-30 20:31:15
Opar is amazing ! The chords used and the sublime voice of Zoe Mthiyane remind me of the good old days of RCP.
It's nice to see that RCP haven't totally forgotten their origins !

rockhound reply Replies: 1 || 2016-07-30 08:29:48
is it true, that rupert is also working on mel gibsons Hacksaw Ridge together with john debney?


lanlan2016-07-30 11:09:21
yes

Miles reply Replies: 4 || 2016-06-17 01:24:06
It's now available for listening and pre-order (or maybe accidental early release!) on iTunes! Tracklist is as follows:

1. Opar (performed by Zoe Mthiyane) - 3:28
2. Diamonds - 4:50
3. Togetherness - 1:44
4. Steamer and Butterfly - 2:40
5. Orphaned - 2:46
6. Returning Home - 4:01
7. Campfire - 2:40
8. Tarzan and Jane - 3:39
9. Village Ambush - 4:41
10. Catching the Train - 2:16
11. Rom's Plan - 2:11
12. Akut Fight - 2:16
13. Elephants in the Night - 3:12
14. Jane Escapes - 2:44
15. Jungle Shooting - 2:41
16. Kala's Death - 5:15
17. Where Was Your Honor? - 2:29
18. Boma Port - 4:04
19. Stampede - 4:33
20. On the Boat - 3:10
21. The Legend of Tarzan - 2:36
22. Better Love (Film Version) (performed by Hozier) - 3:23


Ds2016-06-17 07:48:20
It is indeed available for purchase on iTunes, and it's just 4,99€, I don't see any reason not to buy it! Just bought it, and so far it sounds good!


callmee2016-06-20 14:37:16
Will there be a CD release or it's download only again?


Russel2016-06-20 21:45:29
It's not accidental.


callmee2016-06-21 08:02:40
OK, now I have found it: manufactured on demand CD-R only. Well, I still prefer it to mp3 download only versions.

Morgan Joylighter reply Replies: 1 || 2016-06-20 08:08:10
Really surprising to hear something so intense and epic from Rupert...I had basically given up on him since he got typecase into doing bland comedy scores, even though his early 2000s output (Jack & The Beanstalk, Bee Movie) showed tons of promise. Wish there were more composers writing music like this...people complain about the Zimmer sound taking over Hollywood but honestly there are only a handful of scores that sound like this every year. And this one is orchestral enough to please both sides I think!


Anonymous2016-06-20 11:47:59
Well there was a time many scores sounded like this.

But since Zimmer has evolved, Hollywood has evoled with it too. Every score now sounds like a Zimmer/Junkie simulation.

That's why this score sounds refreshing and a bit more old skool. After all this type of scores got me into film music years ago.

Anonymous reply Replies: 1 || 2016-06-19 13:25:59
Great score. It really sounds like the great scores Hans used to make pre-inception. Love it!


Ds2016-06-19 18:20:52
Indeed. At first I thought it was good but not great, but after a few listens I really dig it, great stuff! Nice themes and subtle orchestration, nice job from RGW.

Hybrid Soldier reply Replies: 5 || 2016-05-16 22:03:58
Yep and since it's in a month & half, better I add it ! lol


Ds2016-05-16 22:45:18
So HZ is "musical consultant" here... official or officious? :-)


Hybrid Soldier2016-05-16 22:46:19
He didn't write anything on this. Just did a little communication. Well at least that was the case 1 and a half month ago !! lol


Ds2016-05-16 22:51:35
... but surely WaterTower won't resist the temptation of putting his name on the cover, right? :-p


Miles2016-06-17 01:25:38
Cover's up. Just has Rupert's name; no mention of Zimmer.


0-^-02016-06-17 13:22:41
It may not have Hans Zimmer's name anywhere on it but the music does have his style emulated in the work. Good score, nevertheless.

 HANS-ZIMMER.com© 2001-2018 OST 
The Legend Of Tarzan soundtrack - Rupert Gregson-Williams 2016